Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association
Replacing preconceived accounts of digital games with experience of play: When parents went native in GTA IV
Abstract
Cautionary frameworks continue to dominate evaluations of games within political contexts, obstructing consideration of the specific conditions and experiences offered by particular game texts. This paper challenges this tendency of prior government-instigated research to promote viewpoints that are not textually evaluative or play-derived when reporting on perceptions of games possessed by the public. Instead, it prioritizes Dovey and Kennedy’s (2006) argument that ‘we cannot have recourse solely to [games] textual characteristics; we have to pay particular attention to the moment of its enactment as it is played.’ More concretely, this paper describes research sparked by the NZ Classification Office’s interest in exploring ‘the extent to which the public’s perception of causal links between game playing and various social ills’ might be ‘moderated or even undermined by [knowledge of] how players actually respond to and negotiate their way through the content and characteristics of the medium’ (OFLC 2009, 24). Using both game-play observation and in-depth interviews, we concluded that the participants’ preconceptions of Grand Theft Auto IV (Rockstar North, 2008) were drastically reevaluated after experience playing the game, shifting attitudes and beliefs as to how games should be regulated.
References
Aarseth, E. “I Fought the Law: Transgressive Play and the Implied Player,†in B. Akira (ed.) Situated Play: Proceedings of the 2007 Digital Games Research Association Conference, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 2007.
Aarseth, E. “Playing Research: Methodological Approaches to Game Analysis,†in Proceedings of the Digital Arts and Culture Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 2003.
Buckingham, D. & Bragg, S. Young People, Sex and the Media: The facts of life? Palgrave, New York, 2004.
Burn, A. & Parker, D. “Making Your Mark: Digital inscription, animation and a new visual semiotic,†in Education, Communication & Information, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2001), pp 155-179.
Cicourel, A.V. Method and Measurement in Sociology. Free Press, New York, 1964.
Dovey, J. & Kennedy, H. Game Cultures: computer games as new media, Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK, 2006.
Drake, R. A., & Myers, L. R. “Visual attention, emotion, and action tendency: Feeling active or passive,†in Cognition and Emotion, Vol. 20, No. 5 (2006), pp. 608-622.
Duffelmeyer, B. “Using Digital Technology to Augment a Critical Literacy Approach to First-Year Composition,†in R. Muffoletto (ed.) Education and Technology: Critical and Reflective Practices, Hampton Press, Creskill, NJ, 2001.
Gee, J. P. What Video Games Have to Teach us about Learning and Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2003.
Green, B., Ried, J-A. & Bigum, C. “Teaching the Nintendo Generation,†in S. Howard (ed.). Wired Up: The electronic media, UCL Press, London, 1998.
Grodal, T. “Stories for Eye, Ear and Muscles. Video Games, Media, and Embodied Experience,†in M. J. P. Wolf and B. Perron (eds.) The Video Game Theory Reader, Routledge, New York, 2003.
Gubrium, J. F. & Holstein, J. A. (eds.). Postmodern Interviewing, Sage, London, 2003.
Heckathorn, D. D. “Respondent Driven Sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden
populations,†in Social Problems, Vol. 44, No. 2 (1997), pp. 174-199.
Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., Zubek, R. “MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research,†in Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game A.I., AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 2004.
Kirkpatrick, G. “Controller, Hand, Screen: Aesthetic form in the computer game,†in Game and Culture, Vol. 4, No. 2 (2009), pp. 127-143.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
Misztal, B. A. Informality: Social theory and contemporary practice. Routledge, London, 2000.
Niedenthal, S. "What We Talk About When We Talk About Game Aesthetics,†in Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory, Proceedings of DiGRA 2009. http://www.digra.org/dl/db/09287.17350.pdf.
Office of Film and Literature Classification. Public Perceptions of a Violent Videogame: X-Men Origins: Wolverine. OFLC, Wellington, 2009.
Oliver, M. & Pelletier, C. “The Things We Learned on Liberty Island: Designing games to help people become competent game players,†Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views – Worlds in Play.
Prensky, M. Digital Game-Based Learning. McGraw Hill, New York, 2001.
Putnam, R. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York, 2000.
Rockstar North (2008). Grand Theft Auto IV. [Xbox 360], Rockstar Games.
Thompson, C. “Grand Theft Auto IV Delivers Deft Satire of Street Life,†in Wired Magazine (2008).
http://www.wired.com/gaming/gamingreviews/commentary/games/2008/05/ga
mesfrontiers_0502. (accessed 14 April 2010).
Turkle, S. The Second Self: Computers and the human spirit. Simon and Schuster, New York, 1984.
Zagal, J. P. “Ethically Notable Videogames: Moral Dilemmas and Gameplay,†in Breaking NewGround: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory, Proceedings of DiGRA 2009. http://www.digra.org/dl/db/ 09287.13336.pdf.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v1i1.5